We can not be acting too funny by putting entire blame on Dhoni for some of his decisions in the crucial match against England on 14th June. I say its funny because for similar decisions or sometimes even more amusing decisions taken by Dhoni, when worked, we made a king out of him. And today when it hasn’t worked out, we are ready to give him all the blame in the world.
If we take him to the heights for choosing Joginder for the last over in 1st T20 World Cup final over, I do not see any reason why we should be bashing him for choosing Ravindra Jadeja to bat at 4. This decision was logically better than the Joginder one. One ok or ordinary sort of decision makes you king and one reasonably good decision offers you defamation – funny world.
Problem about such instinct based decision making is, you are judged by the result of that decision and not the quality of thinking. We tend to forget that decision is taken when one does not know the result. This can sound obvious or even ridiculous, but isn’t that what it is? Go by the book is not the best option always (if it was, Dravid would still be captaining India). Captain can not be bookish, he got to work on instincts and back his own instincts. When they do not work, as a captain you find yourself on wrong side, but if you keep working as the book says, you will definitely find yourself as somebody who is a non-achiever.
Suddenly, there have been a lot of talks and whispers about Dhoni batting at 3. So what? What’s the problem? He has done it before; it has worked or not worked a few times. How has it become a big problem now? “He should not be batting before Raina…”…hello… do we think it was right that he batted before Dravid, Yuvraj and Rohit Sharma in the past? Today some reporter is asking him questions like, “When will you start hitting sixes again – start playing like what you used to?” If India hadn’t lost the game, we would have still showered praises on Dhoni for having successfully geared himself to play anchor types innings; captain’s innings; so called!
This has happened in the past and will keep repeating; faces will change.
We celebrated Ganguly for fighting with selectors to get young guns in and then blamed his demanding style as arrogance and bias for some players. We hyped Greg Chappell’s theories of having youngsters and building team for 2007 ODI World Cup. When we got the result of World Cup, we threw him out and blamed for destroying Indian cricket. We took captain Dravid to heights by saying ‘he deserves’ because of methodic approach and then we blamed him for being bookish, weak and non-innovative.
Now, its Dhoni’s turn. For some of the common sense moves (which any cricketer would have done), we said ‘great captaincy’ and now for some of his not-so-bad decisions we say ‘poor captaincy’. Earlier we called him ‘cool’, ‘straight-forward’ etc, now we call him ‘arrogant’. You are crowned and within no time, you find yourself on the streets where each person in your kingdom is thirsty for your blood.
Praising somebody is a free choice but while defaming we need to be more responsible, more reasonable, rather.